Re: [PATCH] sched: rt_rq runtime leakage bug fix

[Cheng Xu]

On 2011-5-12 18:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> it would be nice to know why the , operator version
> doesn't work though, since that looks to be the more conventional way to
> write it.
> 

I did some investigation, it looks that, 

1 #define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq)                                   \
2	for (iter = list_entry_rcu(task_groups.next, typeof(*iter), list),  \
3	     rt_rq = iter->rt_rq[cpu_of(rq)]; &iter->list != &task_groups;  \
4	     iter = list_entry_rcu(iter->list.next, typeof(*iter), list),   \
5	     rt_rq = iter->rt_rq[cpu_of(rq)])

in for loop, when task_groups (as sentinel node of the doubly linked circular list) is reached after the final iteration, a fake iter (of struct task_group *) is calculated at line 4 via container_of(&task_groups, struct task_group, list). By "fake", as we know, it is just an address, with &iter->list == &task_groups, but not pointing to a true struct task_group object. Accessing other members of fake iter might be the cause of page fault. 

In my JS22 blade, cpu_of(rq)=1 and fake iter->rt_rq happens to be 0x100000000, value of another global variable near task_groups. Kernel tries to take it plus 8 as address, to retrieve iter->rt_rq[1]. and then page fault happens at address 0x100000008. 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/