Re: [GIT PULL] isci merge candidate

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Fri May 13 2011 - 18:17:17 EST



> It's a SAS (serial-attached-scsi) driver so it ties in to libsas rather
> than libata (libsas itself ties in to libata for tunnelling SATA
> protocol over SAS). The size is attributable to the fact that all
> protocol handling for non-fast path i/o is handled by software. There
> are still cleanups that can be made, but likely not on the on the same
> order of what we have already done.

How much of that non-fast-path could/should be in generic code vs. in
the driver specific code ? IE. If somebody comes up with another "dumb"
SAS adapter tomorrow that doesn't do all that magic in an offload CPU,
is any of that code re-usable ?

Cheers,
Ben.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/