Re: [PATCH] sched: fix constructing the span cpu mask of sched domain

From: Hillf Danton
Date: Fri May 13 2011 - 09:06:09 EST


On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 21:26 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
>> Your work for rewriting NUMA support, published at
>> Â Â Â Â Âhttp://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130218515520540
>> is patched by changing how level is computed and by changing how it is
>> used to build the mask.
>>
>> When computing, some valid levels are lost in your work.
>>
>> When building mask, nodes are selected only if they have same distance,
>> thus nodes of less distance are also masked out since the computation of
>> level now is tough.
>>
>> Without MUNA hardware, I did not test the patch:(
>
> I do have a (tiny) NUMA box (2 nodes) but that actually booted with the
> old code too, Andreas Hermann from AMD (CC'ed) is usually willing to
> test such patches on somewhat larger systems. Please send a full patch
> against tip/master for him to apply.
>
>

Hi Peter

In your original work, there is also a mismatch between how level is computed
and how it is used to build the cpu mask.

When computing level, distance is computed with node_distance(0, j),
instead of node_distance(i, j), and I do not think it is typo since the printk
also uses distance(0,%d).

When building cpu mask, however, distance is computed according to
for_each_possible_cpu(j) and node_distance(cpu_to_node(j), k).

Thus I concern there may be distances not covered by the level, see below.

If test result from Andreas is positive,
I over concern,
else
please take the mismatch into your consideration.


thanks
Hillf
---

--- numa_by_peter.c 2011-05-11 20:22:10.000000000 +0800
+++ numa_by_hillf.c 2011-05-13 20:36:46.000000000 +0800
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
static void sched_init_numa(void)
{
- int next_distance, curr_distance = node_distance(0, 0);
struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl;
int level = 0;
int i, j, k;
@@ -11,21 +10,29 @@ static void sched_init_numa(void)
if (!sched_domains_numa_distance)
return;

- next_distance = curr_distance;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) {
- for (j = 0; j < nr_node_ids; j++) {
- int distance = node_distance(0, j);
- printk("distance(0,%d): %d\n", j, distance);
- if (distance > curr_distance &&
- (distance < next_distance ||
- next_distance == curr_distance))
- next_distance = distance;
+ for (j = 0; j < nr_node_ids; j++) {
+ int distance = node_distance(0, j);
+ printk("distance(0,%d): %d\n", j, distance);
+ for (i = 0; i < level; i++) {
+ /* check if already exist */
+ if (distance == sched_domains_numa_distance[i])
+ goto next_node;
+ /* sort and insert it */
+ if (distance < sched_domains_numa_distance[i])
+ break;
}
- if (next_distance != curr_distance) {
- sched_domains_numa_distance[level++] = next_distance;
+ if (i == level) {
+ sched_domains_numa_distance[level++] = distance;
sched_domains_numa_levels = level;
- curr_distance = next_distance;
- } else break;
+ continue;
+ }
+ for (k = level -1; k >= i; k--)
+ sched_domains_numa_distance[k+1] =
+ sched_domains_numa_distance[k];
+ sched_domains_numa_distance[i] = distance;
+ sched_domains_numa_levels = ++level;
+next_node:
+ ;
}

sched_domains_numa_masks = kzalloc(sizeof(void *) * level, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -44,8 +51,9 @@ static void sched_init_numa(void)
struct cpumask *mask =
per_cpu_ptr(sched_domains_numa_masks[i], j);

+ cpumask_clear(mask);
for (k = 0; k < nr_node_ids; k++) {
- if (node_distance(cpu_to_node(j), k) >
+ if (node_distance(cpu_to_node(j), k) !=
sched_domains_numa_distance[i])
continue;

@@ -57,6 +65,17 @@ static void sched_init_numa(void)
}
}

+ for (j = 0; j < nr_node_ids; j++)
+ for (k = 0; k < nr_node_ids; k++) {
+ int distance = node_distance(j, k);
+ for (i = 0; i < level; i++)
+ if (distance == sched_domains_numa_distance[i])
+ goto covered;
+ printk("distance(%d,%d): %d not covered by level\n",
+ j, k, distance);
+ covered:
+ ;
+ }
tl = kzalloc((ARRAY_SIZE(default_topology) + level) *
sizeof(struct sched_domain_topology_level), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tl)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/