Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Thu May 12 2011 - 10:43:31 EST
On Wed, 11 May 2011, Mel Gorman wrote:
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2198,7 +2198,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_free);
> * take the list_lock.
> */
> static int slub_min_order;
> -static int slub_max_order = PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER;
> +static int slub_max_order;
If we really need to do this then do not push this down to zero please.
SLAB uses order 1 for the meax. Lets at least keep it theere.
We have been using SLUB for a long time. Why is this issue arising now?
Due to compaction etc making reclaim less efficient?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/