Re: [PATCH 2/3] printk: Add %ptc to safely print a task's comm

[john stultz]

On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 18:10 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 17:51 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Could misuse of %ptc (not using current) cause system lockup?
> 
> It very well could. Although I don't see other %p options tring to
> handle invalid pointers. Any suggestions on how to best handle this?

And just to clarify on this point, I'm responding to if a invalid
pointer was provided, causing the dereference to go awry.

If a valid non-current task was provided, the locking should be ok as we
disable irqs while the write_seqlock is held in set_task_comm().

The only places this could cause a problem was if you tried to printk
with a %ptc while holding the task->comm_lock. However, the lock is only
shortly held in task_comm_string, and get_task_comm and set_task_comm.
So it is fairly easy to audit for correctness.

If there is some other situation you had in mind, please let me know.

thanks
-john


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/