Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers: create a pinmux subsystem

[Linus Walleij]

2011/5/11 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 00:18 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> 2011/5/2 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 21:16 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> >> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinmux/core.c b/drivers/pinmux/core.c
>> > Trivial comments follow
>> >> +static inline int pin_is_valid(int pin)
>> >> +{
>> >> +     return ((unsigned)pin) < MACH_NR_PINS;
>> >> +}
>> > Couldn't pin just be declared unsigned or maybe u32?
>> No, because like in the GPIO subsystem you *may* want to send in invalid
>> pins, and those are identified by negative numbers.
>
> Then I think this is clearer and the compiler
> should produce the same code.
>
> static inline bool pin_is_valid(int pin)
> {
>        return pin >= 0 && pin < MACH_NR_PINS;
> }

Yes indeed, I'll fix. Can you propose a patch to the same pattern
found in include/asm-generic/gpio.h? It would bring equal
clarity there I believe.

Thanks!
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/