RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: don't unmask disabled irqs when migratingthem

[Stefano Stabellini]

On Mon, 9 May 2011, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> yes, with your patch this issue disappears, since you explicitly make mask/unmask as
> a nop for xen_percpu_chip, which effectively avoids them from undesired unmask
> when doing the migration. Though it works, it's not intuitive as to me it's an
> workaround to make Xen chip implementation adapting to specific fixup_irqs logic.

I have been tring to follow the example of existing supported drivers.
The only x86 driver I could find that uses handle_percpu_irq is uv_irq
that does exatly the same thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/