Re: [PATCH v3] mm: make expand_downwards symmetrical to expand_upwards

From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Fri Apr 22 2011 - 04:02:19 EST


On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:12 AM, David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
>> > index 56240e7..a7ad8fb 100644
>> > --- a/init/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/init/Kconfig
>> > @@ -1226,6 +1226,7 @@ config SLAB
>> >           per cpu and per node queues.
>> >
>> >  config SLUB
>> > +       depends on BROKEN || NUMA || !DISCONTIGMEM
>> >         bool "SLUB (Unqueued Allocator)"
>> >         help
>> >            SLUB is a slab allocator that minimizes cache line usage
>>
>>
>> I already sent it to linux-arch and there's been no dissent; there have
>> been a few "will that fix my slub bug?" type of responses.
>
> I was concerned about tile because it actually got all this right by using
> N_NORMAL_MEMORY appropriately and it uses slub by default, but it always
> enables NUMA at the moment so this won't impact it.
>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm OK with this Kconfig patch. Can someone send a proper patch with
signoffs and such? Do we want to tag this for -stable too?

Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/