Re: [PATCH v3] mm: make expand_downwards symmetrical toexpand_upwards
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Tue Apr 19 2011 - 14:11:10 EST
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Right !NUMA systems only have node 0.
>
> That's rubbish. Discontigmem uses the nodes field to identify the
> discontiguous region. page_to_nid() returns this value. Your code
> wrongly assumes this is zero for non NUMA.
Sorry the kernel has no node awareness if you do not set CONFIG_NUMA
F.e. zone node lookups work the following way
static inline int
zone_to_nid(struct zone *zone)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
return zone->node;
#else
return 0;
#endif
}
How in the world did you get a zone setup in node 1 with a !NUMA config?
The problem seems to be that the kernel seems to allow a
definition of a page_to_nid() function that returns non zero in the !NUMA
case. And slub relies on page_to_nid returning zero in the !NUMA case.
Because NODES_WIDTH should be 0 in the !NUMA case and therefore
page_to_nid must return 0.
> I can fix the panic by hard coding get_nodes() to return the zero node
> for the non-numa case ... however, presumably it's more than just this
> that's broken in slub?
If you think that is broken then we have brokenness all over the kernel
whenever we determine the node from a page and use that to do a lookup.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/