Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: add pin biasing and drive mode to gpiolib

From: Mark Brown
Date: Mon Apr 18 2011 - 18:31:17 EST


On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 08:16:12AM +1000, Ben Nizette wrote:
> On 18/04/2011, at 9:59 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Even if it ends up being the board code using these APIs it seems
> > sensible to have a standard API that GPIO drivers can use to expose the
> > functionality. This will help with getting control into code Linux owns
> > (since people don't have to implement custom APIs) and will mean we can
> > do things like add control of this for device tree based boards.

> Oh I'm all for platform-specific libraries abstracting this away from the
> board code if that helps, that's certainly the way that, eg, AVR32 does it.
> It just doesn't make sense to me to bounce from the board code in to
> 'generic' gpio code then back to platform-specific implementations when
> you could cut out the middle man.

We have cross platform abstractions for lots of things - device tree,
which I mentioned, is the obvious example - and many of the GPIO
controllers are themselves cross platform as they're for off-SoC chips.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/