Re: [PATCH 1/3] VFS/ioctl: Add punching-hole support to ioctl().

[Josef Bacik]

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 02:14:43PM -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> Frankly I see no point extending the ioctl interface when we have
> a syscall interface.
>

I'd even go so far as to say we could probably axe the xfs and ocfs2 ioctls
since we have the fallocate interface :).  Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/