Re: [PATCH] m68k: fix find_next bitops

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:02, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2011/3/31 Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Andreas, do you think it's worth keeping (and fixing) the m68k "optimized"
>>> versions?
>>
>> Should be easy to add the required offset >= size checks.
>
> OK, I'll try to fix the optimized version.
> Or, could someone who can test on the real hardware fix this problem?

I'll have a look...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

            Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
             Â Â -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/