[PATCH] fs: don't use igrab() while holding i_lock

From: Dave Chinner
Date: Tue Mar 29 2011 - 03:08:38 EST


From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>

Fix the incorrect use of igrab() inside the i_lock in NFS and Cephâ
If we are already holding the i_lock, we have a reference to the
inode so we can safely use ihold() to gain an extra reference. This
avoids hangs due to lock recursion on the i_lock now that the
inode_lock is gone and igrab() uses the i_lock itself.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ceph/addr.c | 2 +-
fs/ceph/snap.c | 4 ++--
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
index 561438b..37368ba 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
ci->i_head_snapc = ceph_get_snap_context(snapc);
++ci->i_wrbuffer_ref_head;
if (ci->i_wrbuffer_ref == 0)
- igrab(inode);
+ ihold(inode);
++ci->i_wrbuffer_ref;
dout("%p set_page_dirty %p idx %lu head %d/%d -> %d/%d "
"snapc %p seq %lld (%d snaps)\n",
diff --git a/fs/ceph/snap.c b/fs/ceph/snap.c
index f40b913..0aee66b 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/snap.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/snap.c
@@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ void ceph_queue_cap_snap(struct ceph_inode_info *ci)

dout("queue_cap_snap %p cap_snap %p queuing under %p\n", inode,
capsnap, snapc);
- igrab(inode);
-
+ ihold(inode);
+
atomic_set(&capsnap->nref, 1);
capsnap->ci = ci;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&capsnap->ci_item);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
index ab1bf5b..a6804f7 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -590,7 +590,8 @@ nfs4_get_open_state(struct inode *inode, struct nfs4_state_owner *owner)
state->owner = owner;
atomic_inc(&owner->so_count);
list_add(&state->inode_states, &nfsi->open_states);
- state->inode = igrab(inode);
+ ihold(inode);
+ state->inode = inode;
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
/* Note: The reclaim code dictates that we add stateless
* and read-only stateids to the end of the list */
--
1.7.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/