Re: [PATCH v2 2.6.38-rc8-tip 4/20] 4: uprobes: Adding and remove auprobe in a rb tree.

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 20:22 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I am not sure if its a good idea to walk the tree
> > as and when the tree is changing either because of a insertion or
> > deletion of a probe.
> 
> I know that you cannot walk the tree lockless except you would use
> some rcu based container for your probes. 

You can in fact combine a seqlock, rb-trees and RCU to do lockless
walks.

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/20/160

and

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/20/437

But doing that would be an optimization best done once we get all this
working nicely.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/