Re: [PATCH 6/8] Add __GFP_OTHER_NODE flag

From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Mon Mar 07 2011 - 19:19:13 EST


> > Yes, less intrusive. But are you using current NUMA stastics on
> > practical system?
>
> Yes I do. I know users use it too.
>
> We unfortunately still have enough NUMA locality problems in the kernel
> so that overflowing nodes, causing fallbacks for process memory etc. are not uncommon.
> If you get that then numastat is very useful to track down what happens.
>
> In an ideal world with perfect NUMA balancing it wouldn't be needed,
> but we're far from that.
>
> Also the numactl test suite depends on them.

If so, I have no objection of cource. :)

Thanks.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/