Re: [PATCH] Make /proc/slabinfo 0400

From: Jesper Juhl
Date: Sat Mar 05 2011 - 19:43:39 EST


On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Dan Rosenberg wrote:

> On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 22:58 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This patch makes these techniques more difficult by making it hard to
> > > know whether the last attacker-allocated object resides before a free or
> > > allocated object. Especially with vulnerabilities that only allow one
> > > attempt at exploitation before recovery is needed to avoid trashing too
> > > much heap state and causing a crash, this could go a long way. I'd
> > > still argue in favor of removing the ability to know how many objects
> > > are used in a given slab, since randomizing objects doesn't help if you
> > > know every object is allocated.
> >
> > So if the attacker knows every object is allocated, how does that help
> > if we're randomizing the initial freelist?
>
> If you know you've got a slab completely full of your objects, then it
> doesn't matter that they happened to be allocated in a random fashion -
> they're still all allocated, and by freeing one of them and
> reallocating, you'll still be next to your target.
>

But still, if randomizing allocations makes life just a little harder for
attackers in some scenarios, why not just do it?
Same with making /proc/slabinfo 0400, if it just makes things a little
harder in a few cases, why not do it? It's not like a admin who needs
/proc/slabinfo to have other permissions can't arrange for that.

Having been employed as a systems administrator for many years and having
seen many a box cracked, my oppinion is that every little bit helps. The
kernel is currently not a hard target and everything we can do to harden
it is a good thing (within reason of course).

Why not just do both randomization and 0400 as a start? We can always
harden further later.

--
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please.
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/