Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] Fix sched rt group scheduling when hierachy is enabled

From: Yong Zhang
Date: Fri Mar 04 2011 - 03:52:31 EST


On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> * Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx> [2011-03-04 11:43:16]:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> > No, not really :) It is required, it is a backup check to see if we
>>>> > have queued tasks, rt_time of 0 and the runqueue is not throttled, why
>>>> > should it be dequeued?
>>>>
>>>> But I can't see where that kind of rt_rq is dequeued, mind pointing it out?
>>>>
>>>
>>> So here is what I saw
>>>
>>> 1. sched_dequeue_stack called from the dequeue path dequeues the
>>> queues and sets rt_nr_running to 0
>>> 2. Enqueuing fails because rt_throttled is set for the group_rq
>>> (parent who is throttled)
>>> 3. This causes further enqueue to fail, since rt_nr_running did
>>> not increment in step 2
>>
>> Whose rt_nr_running? group_rq's or parent of group_rq?
>> For parent of group_rq, yes.
>> For group_rq's, no, because we don't touch its rt_nr_running.
>>
>
> For parent of group_rq
>
>>
>>> , eventually the timer decrements rt_time
>>> to 0 and the task is never picked up.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, you mean this:
>>
>> For a group(A) which has one task(b) attached but A is throttled,so
>> A is unqueued now
>> A.throttled == 1 && A.rt_nr_running == 1
>> Âdeactivate_task(b); /* A.throttled == 1 && A.rt_nr_running == 0 */
>> Â Âdo_sched_rt_period_timer(); /* A.run_time == 0 && A.throttled == 0*/
>
> Note at some point rt_time becomes 0 and if enqueue is not set, the

If the group should be add back, it will be at the first
do_sched_rt_period_timer() which decreases run_time;

> next do_sched_rt_period_timer() is a NOP and does not enqueue back the
> group

Otherwise it will be added back when a task is attching to it.

I still can't see how a unthrottled group which has task attched stay
unqueued.

Thanks,
Yong


--
Only stand for myself
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/