Re: [PATCH] x86, numa: move bootnode definition into srat_64.c

[David Rientjes]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Yinghai Lu wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> index 8e9d339..7e5d0e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@
>  
>  int acpi_numa __initdata;
>  
> +struct bootnode {
> +	u64 start;
> +	u64 end;
> +};
> +
>  static struct bootnode nodes_add[MAX_NUMNODES];
>  
>  static __init int setup_node(int pxm)

Can we get rid of struct bootnode instead and simply reuse 
struct numa_memblk?  The latter isn't actually tied to memblock and is a 
generic representation of a node id and address range.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/