Re: [BUG] lock issue in perf cgroup with jump label enabled

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Mar 03 2011 - 09:15:54 EST


On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 11:06 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > list_add_event() is called with spin lock ctl->lock held, while
> > jump_label_inc() will acquire jump_label_mutex..
>

The below seems to actually work, I totally overlooked the dec case
earlier.

---
Subject: perf: Fix cgroup vs jump_label problem
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Mar 03 11:31:20 CET 2011

Li Zefan reported that the jump label code sleeps and we're calling it
under a spinlock, *fail* ;-)

Reported-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -820,16 +820,8 @@ list_add_event(struct perf_event *event,
list_add_tail(&event->group_entry, list);
}

- if (is_cgroup_event(event)) {
+ if (is_cgroup_event(event))
ctx->nr_cgroups++;
- /*
- * one more event:
- * - that has cgroup constraint on event->cpu
- * - that may need work on context switch
- */
- atomic_inc(&per_cpu(perf_cgroup_events, event->cpu));
- jump_label_inc(&perf_sched_events);
- }

list_add_rcu(&event->event_entry, &ctx->event_list);
if (!ctx->nr_events)
@@ -957,11 +949,8 @@ list_del_event(struct perf_event *event,

event->attach_state &= ~PERF_ATTACH_CONTEXT;

- if (is_cgroup_event(event)) {
+ if (is_cgroup_event(event))
ctx->nr_cgroups--;
- atomic_dec(&per_cpu(perf_cgroup_events, event->cpu));
- jump_label_dec(&perf_sched_events);
- }

ctx->nr_events--;
if (event->attr.inherit_stat)
@@ -2903,6 +2892,10 @@ static void free_event(struct perf_event
atomic_dec(&nr_task_events);
if (event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN)
put_callchain_buffers();
+ if (is_cgroup_event(event)) {
+ atomic_dec(&per_cpu(perf_cgroup_events, event->cpu));
+ jump_label_dec(&perf_sched_events);
+ }
}

if (event->buffer) {
@@ -6478,6 +6471,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
err = perf_cgroup_connect(pid, event, &attr, group_leader);
if (err)
goto err_alloc;
+ /*
+ * one more event:
+ * - that has cgroup constraint on event->cpu
+ * - that may need work on context switch
+ */
+ atomic_inc(&per_cpu(perf_cgroup_events, event->cpu));
+ jump_label_inc(&perf_sched_events);
}

/*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/