Re: RFC: x86: kill binutils 2.16.x?

[Ingo Molnar]

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 03/02/2011 01:17 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > 
> >> On 03/02/2011 12:54 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please lets get rid of known to be broken shite instead of trying to
> >>> work around it for no good reasons. How old is that crap again ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> 2005-2006.
> > 
> > Time enough even for enterprise folks to sort that out. Please kill it
> > ASAP.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> 
> kbuild people: is there a way to test for a specific assembler version
> in Kbuild (and error out the build for it?)

Could we add a testcase for one of the more egregious breakages and bail out then? 
That way we don't have to get the version information right - broken prereleases 
would be covered as well.

For example this sequence:

.irp idx,0,1,2
.if 0 > \idx
.endif
.endr

Will break on 2.16, right? It builds fine on 2.20.

This is how specific GAS functionality is tested in arch/powerpc:

        @if ! /bin/echo dssall | $(AS) -many -o $(TOUT) >/dev/null 2>&1 ; then \
                echo -n '*** ${VERSION}.${PATCHLEVEL} kernels no longer build ' ; \
                echo 'correctly with old versions of binutils.' ; \
                echo '*** Please upgrade your binutils to 2.12.1 or newer' ; \
                false ; \
        fi

This would also be a 'constructive' (and safest) way of blacklisting binutils: we'd 
really only exclude binutils that is truly buggy.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/