Re: RFC: x86: kill binutils 2.16.x?

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:11:31PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 12:03 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:15:14 -0800
> > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> binutils 2.16 (and presumably its prereleases, binutils 2.15.9x) appears
> >> to have more bugs than any other version of binutils released in modern
> >> history, *before or after*.
> >>
> >> We chronically run into problems because that particular binutils
> >> version breaks code that works fine elsewhere.
> >>
> >> I would like to know who would suffer from formally discontinuing
> >> support for that version.  I understand some version of SLES shipped it,
> >> but I don't know for sure.
> >>
> > 
> > I gave up and became a customer of
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/index_old.shtml
> 
> Vegard,
> 
> The source directory in the above doesn't seem to match the binary
> directories, and is stuck at binutils 2.16.1.  At the very best this is
> iffy from a GPL perspective, and very confusing to users.
> 
> This is obviously a highly useful project, can we straighten out the
> source situation?

The binaries has never worked for me (on my Intel Atom 32 bit box).
Today I use crosstool-ng - which works great.
[Need to polish my patch to add saprc support...]

URL: http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/projects/crosstool

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/