Re: [PATCH -tip 1/2 resend] x86, nmi: Define a name for NMI controlport

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On 03/02/2011 10:35 PM, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:32:30PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> Also add a comment anout why we need in-out operations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> Ingo I hope this time I've resolved MUA space injection.
>>
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h |   18 +++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h
>> =====================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h
>> +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h
>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>>  #include <asm/mc146818rtc.h>
>>
>>  #define NMI_REASON_PORT		0x61
>> +#define NMI_ENABLE_PORT		0x70 /* Real-Time Clock Address Register as well */
>>
>>  #define NMI_REASON_SERR		0x80
>>  #define NMI_REASON_IOCHK	0x40
>> @@ -30,12 +31,19 @@ static inline void reassert_nmi(void)
>>  		old_reg = current_lock_cmos_reg();
>>  	else
>>  		lock_cmos(0); /* register doesn't matter here */
>> -	outb(0x8f, 0x70);
>> -	inb(0x71);		/* dummy */
> 
> I was wondering if 0x71 should get a name change too.  Then again I can't
> find the Intel doc that tells me what 0x70 is either (I remember seeing it
> somewhere).
> 
> Cheers,
> Don

  Well, me specs are on another machine (which I didn't copied back yet :) but
if my memory doesn't betray me it can be found in ICH specification. For 0x71 i
simply don't remember how it's named in spec but it stands for RTC ram target
register iirc.

-- 
    Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/