Re: [PATCH 3/6] perf record: add time-of-day option

[David Ahern]

On 03/01/2011 09:37 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:09 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>>
>> I did not code it create samples of a realtime-clock event; I coded it
>> to add an event to the stream on demand -- whatever event the fd is
>> tied to.
>>
>>
> Well yes, but aside from you and the realtime clock stuff, who'd ever
> want to do this particular thing?

One example would be a system watchdog that decided for some reason or
another to force an event sample because of some event it detected.

> 
> I'd much rather expose the whole
> local_clock()/perf_clock()/trace_clock() (should all be the same anyway)
> as a posix clock using CLOCK_TRACING or whatever would be an appropriate
> name.
> 
> [ Since the whole thing is NMI safe it should be well possible to make a
> VDSO version as well. ]
> 
> Anyway, once its visible as a posix clock you can sync up from
> userspace. And this clock is indeed wanted for other things too, like
> user-space tracing etc.
> 

And for some silly reason I sense a time trap here (pun intended) .....

So your pushback is:
1. throw out the realtime-clock event patch,

2. add a new CLOCK_TRACING type to clock_gettime with VDSO hook,

3. and use a synthesized event from userspace for snapshotting
perf_clock to time-of-day -- similar to what I have now, but one that
will guarantee a time-of-day to perf_clock correlation (versus the
current one which hopes that perf_clock is the monotonic clock).

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/