Re: Fwd: [PATCH 05/18] MAINTAINERS: Remove unnecessarylinux-kernel@vger.kernel.org entries

From: Harry Wei
Date: Tue Mar 01 2011 - 09:47:40 EST


On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:43:03PM +0800, jiaweiwei wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2011/3/1
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] MAINTAINERS: Remove unnecessary
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx entries
> To: joe@xxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:10:30PM +0800, Harry Wei wrote:
>
> Please fix your MUA to word wrap within paragraphs.
I am so sorry, i will do.
>
> > I agree with Joe. I think any patch about kernel should be
> > emailed to LKML and other connection ML, as well as maintainers.
>
> You're missing my point. My point is that removing references to LKML
> from MAINTAINERS is working against this as it makes it harder for users
> to work out that they're supposed to do this.
Maybe you are right.

Thanks.
Best Regards.
Harry Wei.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
> --
> do kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/