Re: [PATCH -v4] kbuild: Add extra gcc checks

[AmÃrico Wang]

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 12:35:00PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>On Monday 28 February 2011, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> My intention was not to have multiple levels of warnings because then
>> you have to go and enable the different levels and have to remember
>> which level you used last, etc, etc.
>
>I wasn't suggesting more than two, so the two would have very distinct
>definitions:
>
>W=1: Warnings that we would like to fix all over the tree, patches to
>     remove these are always welcome and you can build the entire kernel
>     with it. Once they are all fixed, we can make the warnings the default.
>
>W=2: Warnings that we know we don't always want to fix, meant for what
>     you describe here -- you build a single file and decide what to
>     do based on common sense. 
>

Right, this makes sense. Borislav, could you implement this?

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/