Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] writeback: create dirty_info structure

From: Minchan Kim
Date: Sun Feb 27 2011 - 11:38:46 EST


On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:35:55PM -0800, Greg Thelen wrote:
> Bundle dirty limits and dirty memory usage metrics into a dirty_info
> structure to simplify interfaces of routines that need all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> Changelog since v4:
> - Within new dirty_info structure, replaced nr_reclaimable with nr_file_dirty
> and nr_unstable_nfs to give callers finer grain dirty usage information.
> - Added new dirty_info_reclaimable() function.
> - Made more use of dirty_info structure in throttle_vm_writeout().
>
> Changelog since v3:
> - This is a new patch in v4.
>
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 7 ++---
> include/linux/writeback.h | 15 ++++++++++++-
> mm/backing-dev.c | 18 +++++++++------
> mm/page-writeback.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> mm/vmstat.c | 6 +++-
> 5 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 59c6e49..d75e4da 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -595,12 +595,11 @@ static void __writeback_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb,
>
> static inline bool over_bground_thresh(void)
> {
> - unsigned long background_thresh, dirty_thresh;
> + struct dirty_info info;
>
> - global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
> + global_dirty_info(&info);
>
> - return (global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
> - global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) > background_thresh);
> + return dirty_info_reclaimable(&info) > info.background_thresh;
> }

Get unnecessary nr_writeback.

>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
> index 0ead399..a06fb38 100644
> --- a/include/linux/writeback.h
> +++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
> @@ -84,6 +84,19 @@ static inline void inode_sync_wait(struct inode *inode)
> /*
> * mm/page-writeback.c
> */
> +struct dirty_info {
> + unsigned long dirty_thresh;
> + unsigned long background_thresh;
> + unsigned long nr_file_dirty;
> + unsigned long nr_writeback;
> + unsigned long nr_unstable_nfs;
> +};
> +
> +static inline unsigned long dirty_info_reclaimable(struct dirty_info *info)
> +{
> + return info->nr_file_dirty + info->nr_unstable_nfs;
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
> void laptop_io_completion(struct backing_dev_info *info);
> void laptop_sync_completion(void);
> @@ -124,7 +137,7 @@ struct ctl_table;
> int dirty_writeback_centisecs_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
> void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
>
> -void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty);
> +void global_dirty_info(struct dirty_info *info);
> unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> unsigned long dirty);
>
> diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> index 027100d..17a06ab 100644
> --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
> @@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ static int bdi_debug_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> struct backing_dev_info *bdi = m->private;
> struct bdi_writeback *wb = &bdi->wb;
> - unsigned long background_thresh;
> - unsigned long dirty_thresh;
> + struct dirty_info dirty_info;
> unsigned long bdi_thresh;
> unsigned long nr_dirty, nr_io, nr_more_io, nr_wb;
> struct inode *inode;
> @@ -82,8 +81,8 @@ static int bdi_debug_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> nr_more_io++;
> spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
>
> - global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
> - bdi_thresh = bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, dirty_thresh);
> + global_dirty_info(&dirty_info);
> + bdi_thresh = bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, dirty_info.dirty_thresh);
>
> #define K(x) ((x) << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10))
> seq_printf(m,
> @@ -99,9 +98,14 @@ static int bdi_debug_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> "state: %8lx\n",
> (unsigned long) K(bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK)),
> (unsigned long) K(bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE)),
> - K(bdi_thresh), K(dirty_thresh),
> - K(background_thresh), nr_dirty, nr_io, nr_more_io,
> - !list_empty(&bdi->bdi_list), bdi->state);
> + K(bdi_thresh),
> + K(dirty_info.dirty_thresh),
> + K(dirty_info.background_thresh),

Get unnecessary nr_file_dirty, nr_writeback, nr_unstable_nfs.

> + nr_dirty,
> + nr_io,
> + nr_more_io,
> + !list_empty(&bdi->bdi_list),
> + bdi->state);
> #undef K
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 4408e54..00424b9 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ unsigned long determine_dirtyable_memory(void)
> }
>
> /*
> - * global_dirty_limits - background-writeback and dirty-throttling thresholds
> + * global_dirty_info - return dirty thresholds and usage metrics
> *
> * Calculate the dirty thresholds based on sysctl parameters
> * - vm.dirty_background_ratio or vm.dirty_background_bytes
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ unsigned long determine_dirtyable_memory(void)
> * The dirty limits will be lifted by 1/4 for PF_LESS_THROTTLE (ie. nfsd) and
> * real-time tasks.
> */
> -void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty)
> +void global_dirty_info(struct dirty_info *info)
> {
> unsigned long background;
> unsigned long dirty;
> @@ -426,6 +426,10 @@ void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty)
> else
> background = (dirty_background_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
>
> + info->nr_file_dirty = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY);
> + info->nr_writeback = global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK);
> + info->nr_unstable_nfs = global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS);
> +
> if (background >= dirty)
> background = dirty / 2;
> tsk = current;
> @@ -433,8 +437,8 @@ void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty)
> background += background / 4;
> dirty += dirty / 4;
> }
> - *pbackground = background;
> - *pdirty = dirty;
> + info->background_thresh = background;
> + info->dirty_thresh = dirty;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -478,12 +482,9 @@ unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned long dirty)
> static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> unsigned long write_chunk)
> {
> - unsigned long nr_reclaimable;
> + struct dirty_info sys_info;
> long bdi_nr_reclaimable;
> - unsigned long nr_writeback;
> long bdi_nr_writeback;
> - unsigned long background_thresh;
> - unsigned long dirty_thresh;
> unsigned long bdi_thresh;
> unsigned long pages_written = 0;
> unsigned long pause = 1;
> @@ -498,22 +499,19 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> .range_cyclic = 1,
> };
>
> - nr_reclaimable = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
> - global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS);
> - nr_writeback = global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK);
> -
> - global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
> + global_dirty_info(&sys_info);
>
> /*
> * Throttle it only when the background writeback cannot
> * catch-up. This avoids (excessively) small writeouts
> * when the bdi limits are ramping up.
> */
> - if (nr_reclaimable + nr_writeback <=
> - (background_thresh + dirty_thresh) / 2)
> + if (dirty_info_reclaimable(&sys_info) + sys_info.nr_writeback <=
> + (sys_info.background_thresh +
> + sys_info.dirty_thresh) / 2)
> break;
>
> - bdi_thresh = bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, dirty_thresh);
> + bdi_thresh = bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, sys_info.dirty_thresh);
> bdi_thresh = task_dirty_limit(current, bdi_thresh);
>
> /*
> @@ -542,7 +540,8 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> */
> dirty_exceeded =
> (bdi_nr_reclaimable + bdi_nr_writeback > bdi_thresh)
> - || (nr_reclaimable + nr_writeback > dirty_thresh);
> + || (dirty_info_reclaimable(&sys_info) +
> + sys_info.nr_writeback > sys_info.dirty_thresh);
>
> if (!dirty_exceeded)
> break;
> @@ -595,7 +594,8 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> * background_thresh, to keep the amount of dirty memory low.
> */
> if ((laptop_mode && pages_written) ||
> - (!laptop_mode && (nr_reclaimable > background_thresh)))
> + (!laptop_mode && (dirty_info_reclaimable(&sys_info) >
> + sys_info.background_thresh)))
> bdi_start_background_writeback(bdi);
> }
>
> @@ -655,21 +655,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr);
>
> void throttle_vm_writeout(gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> - unsigned long background_thresh;
> - unsigned long dirty_thresh;
> + struct dirty_info sys_info;
>
> for ( ; ; ) {
> - global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
> + global_dirty_info(&sys_info);

Get unnecessary nr_file_dirty.

>
> /*
> * Boost the allowable dirty threshold a bit for page
> * allocators so they don't get DoS'ed by heavy writers
> */
> - dirty_thresh += dirty_thresh / 10; /* wheeee... */
> + sys_info.dirty_thresh +=
> + sys_info.dirty_thresh / 10; /* wheeee... */
>
> - if (global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
> - global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK) <= dirty_thresh)
> - break;
> + if (sys_info.nr_unstable_nfs +
> + sys_info.nr_writeback <= sys_info.dirty_thresh)
> + break;
> congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
>
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> index 0c3b504..ec95924 100644
> --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -1044,6 +1044,7 @@ static void *vmstat_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> {
> unsigned long *v;
> int i, stat_items_size;
> + struct dirty_info dirty_info;
>
> if (*pos >= ARRAY_SIZE(vmstat_text))
> return NULL;
> @@ -1062,8 +1063,9 @@ static void *vmstat_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> v[i] = global_page_state(i);
> v += NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS;
>
> - global_dirty_limits(v + NR_DIRTY_BG_THRESHOLD,
> - v + NR_DIRTY_THRESHOLD);
> + global_dirty_info(&dirty_info);
> + v[NR_DIRTY_BG_THRESHOLD] = dirty_info.background_thresh;
> + v[NR_DIRTY_THRESHOLD] = dirty_info.dirty_thresh;
> v += NR_VM_WRITEBACK_STAT_ITEMS;

Get unnecessary nr_file_dirty, nr_writeback, nr_unstable_nfs.

The code itself doesn't have a problem. but although it makes code simple,
sometime it get unnecessary information in that context. The global_page_state never
cheap operation and we have been tried to reduce overhead in page-writeback.
(16c4042f, e50e3720).

Fortunately this patch doesn't increase balance_dirty_pages's overhead and
things affected by this patch are not fast-path.
So I think it doesn't have a problem.

--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/