Re: [PATCH] x86, numa: exit early on numa_reset_distance()

[Tejun Heo]

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 03:08:57PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > But please move the existing numa_distance = NULL before the
> > conditional and do if (!numa_distance_cnt) return;
> 
> confused. Do you mean this one ?

Heh, I was confused.

> @@ -371,11 +371,13 @@ static void __init numa_reset_distance(v
>  {
>  	size_t size;
>  
> -	size = numa_distance_cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
> -	memblock_x86_free_range(__pa(numa_distance),
> -				__pa(numa_distance) + size);
> +	if (numa_distance_cnt) {
> +		size = numa_distance_cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
> +		memblock_x86_free_range(__pa(numa_distance),
> +					__pa(numa_distance) + size);
> +		numa_distance_cnt = 0;
> +	}
>  	numa_distance = NULL;
> -	numa_distance_cnt = 0;

But I like this one better.

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/