Re: [PATCH 1/2] hugepage: Protect region tracking lists with itsown spinlock

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Wed Jan 26 2011 - 04:08:18 EST


On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:32:26PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> In preparation for creating a hash of spinlocks to replace the global
> hugetlb_instantiation_mutex, protect the region tracking code with
> its own spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> The old code locked it with either:
>
> down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> or
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> mutex_lock(&hugetlb_instantiation_mutex);
>
> I chose to keep things simple and wrap everything with a single lock.
> Do we need the parallelism the old code had in the down_write case?
>
>
> Index: powerpc.git/mm/hugetlb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- powerpc.git.orig/mm/hugetlb.c 2011-01-07 12:50:52.090440484 +1100
> +++ powerpc.git/mm/hugetlb.c 2011-01-07 12:52:03.922704453 +1100
> @@ -56,16 +56,6 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(hugetlb_lock);
> /*
> * Region tracking -- allows tracking of reservations and instantiated pages
> * across the pages in a mapping.
> - *
> - * The region data structures are protected by a combination of the mmap_sem
> - * and the hugetlb_instantion_mutex. To access or modify a region the caller
> - * must either hold the mmap_sem for write, or the mmap_sem for read and
> - * the hugetlb_instantiation mutex:
> - *
> - * down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> - * or
> - * down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> - * mutex_lock(&hugetlb_instantiation_mutex);
> */
> struct file_region {
> struct list_head link;

A new comment is needed to explain how region_lock is protecting the
region lists.

Otherwise, nothing jumps out as being bad. It does not appear functionality
or locking has really changed. The mutex + mmap_sem is still in place
so the spinlock is redundant for protecting the region lists presumably
until the next patch.

> @@ -73,10 +63,14 @@ struct file_region {
> long to;
> };
>
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(region_lock);
> +
> static long region_add(struct list_head *head, long f, long t)
> {
> struct file_region *rg, *nrg, *trg;
>
> + spin_lock(&region_lock);
> +
> /* Locate the region we are either in or before. */
> list_for_each_entry(rg, head, link)
> if (f <= rg->to)
> @@ -106,6 +100,7 @@ static long region_add(struct list_head
> }
> nrg->from = f;
> nrg->to = t;
> + spin_unlock(&region_lock);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -114,6 +109,8 @@ static long region_chg(struct list_head
> struct file_region *rg, *nrg;
> long chg = 0;
>
> + spin_lock(&region_lock);
> +
> /* Locate the region we are before or in. */
> list_for_each_entry(rg, head, link)
> if (f <= rg->to)
> @@ -124,14 +121,17 @@ static long region_chg(struct list_head
> * size such that we can guarantee to record the reservation. */
> if (&rg->link == head || t < rg->from) {
> nrg = kmalloc(sizeof(*nrg), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!nrg)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!nrg) {
> + chg = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> nrg->from = f;
> nrg->to = f;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nrg->link);
> list_add(&nrg->link, rg->link.prev);
>
> - return t - f;
> + chg = t - f;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> /* Round our left edge to the current segment if it encloses us. */
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static long region_chg(struct list_head
> if (&rg->link == head)
> break;
> if (rg->from > t)
> - return chg;
> + goto out;
>
> /* We overlap with this area, if it extends futher than
> * us then we must extend ourselves. Account for its
> @@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ static long region_chg(struct list_head
> }
> chg -= rg->to - rg->from;
> }
> +out:
> +
> + spin_unlock(&region_lock);
> return chg;
> }
>
> @@ -163,12 +166,16 @@ static long region_truncate(struct list_
> struct file_region *rg, *trg;
> long chg = 0;
>
> + spin_lock(&region_lock);
> +
> /* Locate the region we are either in or before. */
> list_for_each_entry(rg, head, link)
> if (end <= rg->to)
> break;
> - if (&rg->link == head)
> - return 0;
> + if (&rg->link == head) {
> + chg = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> /* If we are in the middle of a region then adjust it. */
> if (end > rg->from) {
> @@ -185,6 +192,9 @@ static long region_truncate(struct list_
> list_del(&rg->link);
> kfree(rg);
> }
> +
> +out:
> + spin_unlock(&region_lock);
> return chg;
> }
>
> @@ -193,6 +203,8 @@ static long region_count(struct list_hea
> struct file_region *rg;
> long chg = 0;
>
> + spin_lock(&region_lock);
> +
> /* Locate each segment we overlap with, and count that overlap. */
> list_for_each_entry(rg, head, link) {
> int seg_from;
> @@ -209,6 +221,7 @@ static long region_count(struct list_hea
> chg += seg_to - seg_from;
> }
>
> + spin_unlock(&region_lock);
> return chg;
> }
>
>

--
Mel Gorman
Linux Technology Center
IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/