Re: [PATCH] leds: Fix warnings when PM is disabled for BD2802

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:38:37PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 02:14:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > >  And it leaves
> > > bd2802_i2c_driver.driver.pm pointing at that all-zeroes instance of
> > > dev_pm_ops, which is rather dangerous.
> 
> > Nothing dagerous here - PM core deals with half-filled pm_ops just fine.
> 
> Indeed, all the PM operations are completly optional so there's no
> problem there except for the empty dev_pm_ops we leave lying around for
> each driver.
> 
> > > If CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n, the .driver.pm field shouldn't exist at all.

Not if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is set (that field is for both SLEEP and RUNTIME).

> > Meh, we have _waaay_ too many config options, I'd rather see CONFIG_PM
> > and possibly CONFIG_PM_SLEEP go, maybe leaving us with
> > CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME and maybe not. How many devices out there do not want
> > PM?

You'd be surprised.

> I made the same point earlier; I guess I'll post an RFC patch over the
> weekend.

The truth is CONFIG_PM was a mistake, because it's practically meaningless
(it basically is always set), so we could remove it, I think, but that
would require us to modify _many_ drivers.

CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is distinctly about suspend and hibernation which people
tend to switch off sometimes.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/