Re: [RFC patch 3/5] ftrace trace event add missing semicolumn

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Tue Jan 04 2011 - 19:00:20 EST


On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:16:32PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Add a missing semicolumn at the end of a ftrace definition.
>
> We currently are not seeing any impact of this missing semicolumn because extra
> semicolumns appear all over the place in the code generated from TRACE_EVENT
> within ftrace stages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/trace/ftrace.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/trace/ftrace.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/trace/ftrace.h
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/trace/ftrace.h
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
> #undef DEFINE_EVENT
> #define DEFINE_EVENT(template, name, proto, args) \
> static struct ftrace_event_call __used \
> - __attribute__((__aligned__(4))) event_##name
> + __attribute__((__aligned__(4))) event_##name;

But DEFINE_EVENT() calls are supposed to be ";" terminated, no?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/