Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce hardware spinlock framework

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Jan 04 2011 - 15:20:18 EST


On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:23:20 +0200
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > * Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> [101216 13:34]:
> >> Tony, Andrew, can you please have a look ?
> >>
> >> Any comment or suggestion is appreciated.
> >
> > Looks sane to me from omap point of view and it seems the locks
> > are now all timeout based:
> >
> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Can you please have a look at this patch set (see link no. [1] below) ?

I looked - it looks reasonable. This is exactly the wrong time to be
looking at large new patchsets - please refresh, retest and resend
after -rc1 is released?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/