Re: [stable] [PATCH] [104/223] KVM: Write protect memory afterslot swap

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:08:11PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Wait, there's a 34-lt too?
> 
> I'd like to have all stable kvms pass some minimum acceptance test,
> but that's quiet a lot of trees to maintain.  Why do we have to have
> both 34-lt and 35-lt?

Because people are crazy :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/