Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Add reference timestamp to perf header

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:39:24AM -0700, David S. Ahern wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/12/10 13:16, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> >>  int perf_session__create_kernel_maps(struct perf_session *self)
> >>  {
> >>  	int ret = machine__create_kernel_maps(&self->host_machine);
> >> @@ -167,6 +190,9 @@ struct perf_session *perf_session__new(const char *filename, int mode, bool forc
> >>  		 */
> >>  		if (perf_session__create_kernel_maps(self) < 0)
> >>  			goto out_delete;
> >> +
> >> +		if (perf_session__create_ref_time(self) < 0)
> >> +			goto out_delete;
> > 
> > So, it does record it anytime?
> 
> Simplest to always add it the header as it does no harm if not used. To
> make it conditional means adding an input parameter to
> perf_session__new() and then updating all the callers.
> 
> Is the preference to make it conditional?

No, I suspect the overhead is plain unnoticeable. And if it becomes
any problem one day, we can still make that conditional later.

Thanks.
 
> David
> 
> 
> > 
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >>  	perf_session__update_sample_type(self);
> > 
> > 
> > Other than that, looks good!
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/