Re: perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip

[Don Zickus]

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:59:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:20 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > > I wonder if you should reverse these checks.  If the bios has the perf
> > > counter enabled, there might be a high chance that it fails the first
> > > check and never gets to the actually bios checks.
> > 
> > Ah, good point. 
> 
> Something like so..

Getting closer...

Pentium4s are special they need the double write, so...

> +	/*
> +	 * Now write a value and read it back to see if it matches,
> +	 * this is needed to detect certain hardware emulators (qemu/kvm)
> +	 * that don't trap on the MSR access and always return 0s.
> +	 */
>  	val = 0xabcdUL;
> -	ret |= checking_wrmsrl(x86_pmu.perfctr, val);
> +	ret = checking_wrmsrl(x86_pmu.perfctr, val);

	if (x86_pmu.perfctr_second_write)
		ret |= checking_wrmsrl(x86_pmu.perfctr, val);


solved my p4 problems for kexec.

>  	ret |= rdmsrl_safe(x86_pmu.perfctr, &val_new);
>  	if (ret || val != val_new)
> -		return false;
> +		goto msr_fail;
>  
>  	return true;

Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/