Re: [PATCH] AVR32: Fix sys_execve breakage

From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt
Date: Thu Dec 09 2010 - 03:42:59 EST


On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 09:26 +0100, svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/avr32/include/asm/syscalls.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/avr32/include/asm/syscalls.h b/arch/avr32/include/asm/syscalls.h
> index ab608b7..1440368 100644
> --- a/arch/avr32/include/asm/syscalls.h
> +++ b/arch/avr32/include/asm/syscalls.h
> @@ -21,8 +21,10 @@ asmlinkage int sys_clone(unsigned long, unsigned long,
> unsigned long, unsigned long,
> struct pt_regs *);
> asmlinkage int sys_vfork(struct pt_regs *);
> -asmlinkage int sys_execve(const char __user *, char __user *__user *,
> - char __user *__user *, struct pt_regs *);
> +asmlinkage int sys_execve(const char __user *ufilename,
> + const char __user *const __user *uargv,
> + const char __user *const __user *uenvp,
> + struct pt_regs *regs);
>
> /* kernel/signal.c */
> asmlinkage int sys_sigaltstack(const stack_t __user *, stack_t __user *,

Also discussed at https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/8/401 Sorry for not
letting you know in my first reply.

I am thinking something in the order of