Re: [stable] [patch 2/3] nohz: fix printk_needs_cpu() return valueon offline cpus

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:07 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:32:41PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 01:11:52PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 13:00 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > > plain text document attachment (002_printk_needs_cpu.diff)
> > > > From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > This patch fixes a hang observed with 2.6.32 kernels where timers got
> > > > enqueued on offline cpus.
> [...]
> > 
> > Is this going to make it into .37, or is it going to wait until .38?
> 
> I hope it will go into .37. The same should be true for the
> get_next_timer_interrupt() which addresses the same problem.
> Peter, Ingo?

Ingo just send the pull request to Linus for two of the three patches,
I'll try and feed him the last one today.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/