[092/289] reiserfs: fix inode mutex - reiserfs lock misordering

[Greg KH]

2.6.36-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>

commit da905873effecd1c0166e578bc4b5006f041b18b upstream.

reiserfs_unpack() locks the inode mutex with reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe()
to protect against reiserfs lock dependency.  However this protection
requires to have the reiserfs lock to be locked.

This is the case if reiserfs_unpack() is called by reiserfs_ioctl but
not from reiserfs_quota_on() when it tries to unpack tails of quota
files.

Fix the ordering of the two locks in reiserfs_unpack() to fix this
issue.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Markus Gapp <markus.gapp@xxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c |    7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
@@ -186,12 +186,11 @@ int reiserfs_unpack(struct inode *inode,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	/* we need to make sure nobody is changing the file size beneath
-	 ** us
-	 */
-	reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(&inode->i_mutex, inode->i_sb);
 	depth = reiserfs_write_lock_once(inode->i_sb);
 
+	/* we need to make sure nobody is changing the file size beneath us */
+	reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(&inode->i_mutex, inode->i_sb);
+
 	write_from = inode->i_size & (blocksize - 1);
 	/* if we are on a block boundary, we are already unpacked.  */
 	if (write_from == 0) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/