[152/289] ASoC: Remove volatility from WM8900 POWER1 register

[Greg KH]

2.6.36-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 6d212d8e86fb4221bd91b9266b7567ee2b83bd01 upstream.

Not all bits can be read back from POWER1 so avoid corruption when using
a read/modify/write cycle by marking it non-volatile - the only thing we
read back from it is the chip revision which has diagnostic value only.
We can re-add later but that's a more invasive change than is suitable
for a bugfix.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 sound/soc/codecs/wm8900.c |    6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8900.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8900.c
@@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ static int wm8900_volatile_register(unsi
 {
 	switch (reg) {
 	case WM8900_REG_ID:
-	case WM8900_REG_POWER1:
 		return 1;
 	default:
 		return 0;
@@ -1236,11 +1235,6 @@ static __devinit int wm8900_i2c_probe(st
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	/* Read back from the chip */
-	reg = snd_soc_read(codec, WM8900_REG_POWER1);
-	reg = (reg >> 12) & 0xf;
-	dev_info(&i2c->dev, "WM8900 revision %d\n", reg);
-
 	wm8900_reset(codec);
 
 	/* Turn the chip on */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/