Re: [stable] [00/66] 2.6.36.1-stable review

From: Greg KH
Date: Tue Dec 07 2010 - 15:26:50 EST


On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:50:39AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 04:56:42PM +0100, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 19.11.2010, 14:03 -0800 schrieb Greg KH:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.36.1 release.
> > > There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> > > wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> >
> > This one is missing and crashes my 2.6.36 kernel:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22922
> >
> > This was fixed in 2.6.37-rc1 in commit: a1c6c5698d53 (ext4: fix
> > NULL pointer dereference in print_daily_error_info())
>
> You need to get the ext4 maintainers to ack that and let me know about
> it before I can add it.

As the ext4 maintainers seem to ignoring the stable trees now for some
reason, I'll just apply this and see who complains :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/