Re: [PATCH 2/3] Refactor zone_reclaim

From: Balbir Singh
Date: Wed Dec 01 2010 - 00:22:30 EST


* Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-12-01 10:16:34]:

> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-12-01 10:23:29]:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:45:55 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Refactor zone_reclaim, move reusable functionality outside
> > > of zone_reclaim. Make zone_reclaim_unmapped_pages modular
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Why is this min_mapped_pages based on zone (IOW, per-zone) ?
> >
>
> Kamezawa-San, this has been the design before the refactoring (it is
> based on zone_reclaim_mode and reclaim based on top of that). I am
> reusing bits of existing technology. The advantage of it being
> per-zone is that it integrates well with kswapd.
>

My local MTA failed to deliver the message, trying again.

--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/