Re: [RFC 1/2] deactive invalidated pages

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:16:55 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > By Other approach, app developer uses POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED.
> > > But it has a problem. If kernel meets page is writing
> > > during invalidate_mapping_pages, it can't work.
> > > It is very hard for application programmer to use it.
> > > Because they always have to sync data before calling
> > > fadivse(..POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) to make sure the pages could
> > > be discardable. At last, they can't use deferred write of kernel
> > > so that they could see performance loss.
> > > (http://insights.oetiker.ch/linux/fadvise.html)
> > 
> > If rsync use the above url patch, we don't need your patch. 
> > fdatasync() + POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED should work fine.
> > 
> This is quite true, but the patch itself is fairly invasive and
> unnecessarily so which makes it unsuitable for merging in the eyes of
> the rsync maintainers (not that I can blame them). This is by no fault
> of its author; using fadvise is just far harder than it should be.

Yeah. I agree with this patch don't have negative impact. I was only
curious why Minchan drop autodetect logic.

Please don't think I'm against your effort.

Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/