Re: 2.6.37-rc2-git4: Reported regressions 2.6.35 -> 2.6.36

[Alex Deucher]

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Mark Lord <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10-11-19 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord<kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>
>>> It now comes back at resume time.
>>
>> So that patch helped?
>
> I think so.  It didn't used to resume from suspend with 2.6.36, and now it
> does.
>
>>> But suffers long delays (also sometimes with 2.6.35) doing this:
>>>
>>> [drm:atom_op_jump] *ERROR* atombios stuck in loop for more than 5secs
>>> aborting
>>> [drm:atom_execute_table_locked] *ERROR* atombios stuck executing E576
>>> (len
>>> 105, WS 12, PS 8) @ 0xE5C4
>>> [drm:atom_op_jump] *ERROR* atombios stuck in loop for more than 5secs
>>> aborting
>>> [drm:atom_execute_table_locked] *ERROR* atombios stuck executing ECD2
>>> (len
>>> 86, WS 4, PS 0) @ 0xED05
>>> [drm:atom_op_jump] *ERROR* atombios stuck in loop for more than 5secs
>>> aborting
>>> [drm:atom_execute_table_locked] *ERROR* atombios stuck executing E576
>>> (len
>>> 105, WS 12, PS 8) @ 0xE5C4
>>> PM: resume of devices complete after 15718.253 msecs
>>>
>>
>> It's be nice if you could bisect to track down when those started.
>
> It'd be even nicer if they hadn't started.  :)
>
> What kernel release first had that atom/ops table in it?  I'll try that.
>

2.6.31 or 32 was when radeon kms got merged IIRC.

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/