Re: [PATCH 64 of 66] scale nr_rotated to balance memory pressure

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 03:16:21PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> I haven't seen this patch series carefully yet. So, probably
> my question is dumb. Why don't we need to change ->recent_scanned[] too?

That one is taken care by the prev patch where it is increased by 512
through nr_taken (after the previous patch the isolation methods now
return in 4k units). What was left to update was the nr_rotated++
which is why this patch isn't touching the recent_scanned.

Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/