Re: [PATCH 3/3] mlock: avoid dirtying pages and triggering writeback

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Thu Nov 18 2010 - 08:39:15 EST


On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:43:06AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Why is it at all important that mlock() force block allocation for sparse blocks? It's not at all specified in the mlock() API definition that it does that.
>
> Are there really programs that assume that mlock() == fallocate()?!?

If there are programs that do they can't predate linux 2.6.15, and only
work on btrfs/ext4/xfs/etc, but not ext2/ext3/reiserfs. Seems rather
unlikely to me.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/