Re: [ANNOUNCE] New utility: 'trace'

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 15:00 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > But yes, it is functional.
> 
> I suspect that is what matters mostly - unless you think that it's impossible to 
> have a sane implementation of it, if the users come. 

I'm not sure, I raised the point several times, and I think Steve and
Tom though it was possible to implement sanely, but I'm not sure if it
was expression invariant (the fix that is).

It would be very good to have a definite answer on that.

The idea was to not let the filter engine work on the trace data (once
its gathered) but on the trace argument right at the beginning of the
tracepoint callchain, since some of the trace data is an expression of
the trace argument (say next->prio instead of next), the trace
expression wouldn't stay invariant, you'd have to write a different
filter for the same effect.

So I think it would be wise to make this change sooner rather than
later.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/