Re: [PATCH -v4 1/2] lib, Make gen_pool memory allocator lockless

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Nov 17 2010 - 05:49:51 EST


On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 14:05 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Hi, Peter,
>
> Do you think think irq_work should depend on that? Or we just
> reimplement irq_work based on lockless list and make irq_work depends on
> lockless list?

If you can make it use a lockless list thing that's fine.

I'm not sure Andrew's CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG makes much sense
for CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI=n though..

Anyway, make sure to consolidate net/rds/xlist.h and its users, having
two lockless lists is one too many.

> At least as the first step, I prefer to just make lockless list depend
> on CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG.

But only if the platform has NMIs, otherwise its moot.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/