Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v4] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: AddFlow control/Fix Endianess issue/Separate IF register/Enumerate LECmacro/Move MSI processing/Use BIT(X)/Change Message Object index/Addprefix PCH_

From: David Miller
Date: Tue Nov 16 2010 - 15:43:07 EST

Next message: Mimi Zohar: "Re: [PATCH v1.3 4/4] keys: add new key-type encrypted"
Previous message: Joe Perches: "Re: rfc: rewrite commit subject line for subsystem maintainerpreference tool"
In reply to: Wolfgang Grandegger: "Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v4] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: Add Flowcontrol/Fix Endianess issue/Separate IF register/Enumerate LEC macro/MoveMSI processing/Use BIT(X)/Change Message Object index/Add prefix PCH_"
Next in thread: Wolfram Sang: "Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v4] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: AddFlow control/Fix Endianess issue/Separate IF register/Enumerate LECmacro/Move MSI processing/Use BIT(X)/Change Message Objectindex/Add prefix PCH_"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:39:47 +0100

> Please take into account that this patch got accepted by accident
> (because the maintainer did not respond properly in time). At that time
> the driver was incomplete, not ready for mainline and did not even work
> properly. Therefore it makes little sense to debug or even bisec these
> changes. Just for that reason I made an exemption and added my
> "Acked-by". Hope you can share my arguments.

You don't put stupid on top of stupid and justify the latter using
the former.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/