Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work: Don't ignore possible cmpxchg failure

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 10:32 -0600, Sergio Aguirre wrote:
> Although is very unlikely, it's better to make sure we're not
> letting this happen.
> 
> This solves this compilation warning:
> 
> kernel/irq_work.c: In function 'irq_work_run':
> kernel/irq_work.c:148: warning: value computed is not used
> 

> @@ -145,7 +145,10 @@ void irq_work_run(void)
>  		 * Clear the BUSY bit and return to the free state if
>  		 * no-one else claimed it meanwhile.
>  		 */
> -		cmpxchg(&entry->next, next_flags(NULL, IRQ_WORK_BUSY), NULL);
> +		xchgres = cmpxchg(&entry->next,
> +				  next_flags(NULL, IRQ_WORK_BUSY),
> +				  NULL);
> +		BUG_ON(unlikely(xchgres != next_flags(NULL, IRQ_WORK_BUSY)));

simply adding (void) in front would be much easier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/