Re: [PATCH 2/4] locks: fix leaks on setlease errors

From: J. Bruce Fields
Date: Mon Nov 01 2010 - 14:35:13 EST


On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 01:41:22PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 01:24:40PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > I also have patches that get rid of fl_release_private, fl_mylease, and
> > (almost done) fl_change.
> >
> > Unless you've a better suggestion I'll probably send them out for review
> > and then queue them up with other nfsd changes for 2.6.38.
>
> Sounds good. I was also wondering if we can get rid of ->setlease
> entirely. The file_lock_operations should be enough abstraction to
> reject the leases in theory, but I need to look into it a bit more.

Note that cifs has a real lease operation now. No idea how it works or
if it's really correct.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/