Re: [PATCH 4/7] acpi: use indirect call to register gsi in differentmodes

[Stefano Stabellini]

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> > On 10/06/2010 10:00 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Peter,
> > > I sent this patch a while back as part of the "PV on HVM: receive
> > > interrupts as xen events" series (that it is based upon Konrad's
> > > pcifront series, he sent another version to the list yesterday).
> > > 
> > > Do you think that this is a reasonble approach?
> > > 
> > > If you want to give a look at the whole series you can find it here:
> > > 
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/30/170
> > > 
> > > everything else is Xen specific stuff.
> > > 
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > 
> > 
> > On the surface it seems reasonable.
> > 
> > Thomas Gleixner has been working on greatly revamping a bunch of the x86
> > interrupt code, and this might interact with his stuff, so it would be
> > good if he could comment on it.
> > 
> > [tglx: what they're apparently working on is to redirect APIC interrupts
> > to Xen event channels so they don't have to interact with the simulated
> > memory-mapped APIC.  It's "paravirtualization light".]
> 
> I'm not touching acpi code. So that should be ok.
 
In that case would be OK for me to add an acked-by H. Peter Anvin to
this patch?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/